We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. By using Harrassowitz-Verlag.de you accept our cookies.
 
 
 
Guntsetseg, Dolgor
Differential Case Marking in Mongolian
series:
volume: 39
pages/dimensions: XIII, 204 pages, 16 diagrams, 10 ill., 26 tables - 24 × 17 cm
language: english
binding: Paperback
weight: 380
publishing date: 01.04.2016
prices: 48,00 Eur[D] / 49,40 Eur[A]
ISBN: 978-3-447-10611-5
978-3-447-10611-5 Printed Version 48,00 Eur
978-3-447-19494-5 E-Book (pdf) 48,00 Eur
Please note: With adding E-Book Products to your cart
the payment will be handled via PayPal.
The download will be provided after the payment is confirmed.

Mongolian is a regular DOM (Differential Object Marking) language: the accusative case does not always occur on direct objects. This book investigates the phenomenon starting from the research question of how the Mongolian pattern is influenced by factors that cross-linguistically trigger DOM, such as referentiality, animacy, and topicality. It shows that the examination of any one of these factors on its own is not sufficient, but rather that DOM emerges from a complicated interaction of these features. In addition to DOM, Mongolian also exhibits a specific type of Differential Subject Marking (DSM), in which the subjects of embedded clauses (including adverbial clauses) occur with the accusative case. This is the second issue investigated in the study. Apart from the features already mentioned, sentence structure turns out to be relevant here. More specifically, the adjacent occurrence of main and embedded subjects is identified as a crucial factor for triggering DSM. Both observations about DOM and DSM in Mongolian can be brought together in the generalization that the accusative case in Mongolian is used to distinguish between two arguments not only within a clause but also across clause boundaries. The book provides a detailed analysis of the relevant components of Mongolian grammar, and its findings are supported by extensive experimental studies with a large number of native speakers to ensure the highest quality of linguistic evidence.

Loading...